but does not preclude the publication will Collaborators included in

k22lb10ov · 23 de Janeiro 2013

Related articles:

É necessário se cadastrar para acessar o conteúdo.

's note) in its translated as "Kant three Critical new translation "declare the Outstanding Achievement Award of the Fourth of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, deliberately omitted the name of the book proofreader, Deng's mentor, Professor Yang Zutao, reporting and access to the philosophy of first prize in the name of personal translation pocketed the honor and bonuses. This is called the the "pit teacher case". November 1 this year, known as "fake fighter" said Fang () on the microblogging references online statement identified Xiao-Mang Deng "pit division. November 8, Xiao-Mang Deng Xiao-Mang Deng to Mr. Fang Zhouzai is open letter "(hereinafter referred to as the" open letter "), denying the" pit division, saying the crackdown should be solid enough evidence to opening, Fang this on the issue of "obvious imprudently." December 18, Fang and Xiao-Mang Deng accepted an interview with China Youth Daily reporter. Although they still stuck to their guns, but that will not be easy, "academic crackdown. The pit teacher "or not, still skeptical" open letter, "said the Ministry of Education to declare only the first author, Xiao-Mang Deng returns will be impressed by Tao as" collaborators "and before submission" by Yang teacher couples over the head. " As for the "pocketed bonuses, disclosed in the letter, the the awards the Ministry of Education did not bonuses, but the awards as a performance by Wuhan University, equivalent to 40,000 yuan, half points, hit Deng, Yang's account , "the record". Xiao-Mang Deng also with the letter posted on the Commendation photos printed above "Deng Xiaomang translation, is impressed pottery school,

É necessário se cadastrar para acessar o conteúdo.

. "This indicates the co-winners of two, Fang said I pocketed honors and prizes, there is no convincing basis." Xiao-Mang Deng said. November 9, Fang blog in response to the "open letter" admits "I did not see the award certificate how to write, however, the year the Ministry of Education released the list of winners, winners only Xiao-Mang Deng a "This verification is done under public resources to be able to master." December 18, Fang explained that, "from a recent article written by Mr. Yang Zutao revealed information, as well as public information, I think Deng is problems. "Fang said, the previous Outstanding Achievement Award, Xiao-Mang Deng is the award with others. This session of the "winners" on many award-winning, "why others can more than winning, you can not " Reporter access to the Ministry of Education notification of awards in 2006 and 2005 found that the reporting requirements are not the same. Column in 2006,

É necessário se cadastrar para acessar o conteúdo.

, "declared eligible, the requirements of" cooperative research must be declared by the undersigned without first signature achievements of the person making the application inadmissible. 2005, this column only requires that the "the cooperative research undersigned, university teachers and researchers" There is no limit to the number of reporting,

É necessário se cadastrar para acessar o conteúdo.

. Xiao-Mang Deng Fang misread the "open letter". Although at that time the Ministry of Education regulations only allowed a person to declare, but does not preclude the publication will Collaborators included in, actually do more than one channel announced the "winners" and "I do there is a fine print" is listed in the China Academic Humanities and Social Science Research Outstanding Achievement Award winning roster, the first prize in the philosophy class I and impressed pottery two names. "Xiao-Mang Deng said. Not find the most important evidence in the case, he alone is a online easily seized "winners" and online of Mr. Yang Zutao idea of â€‹â€‹individual guesses finds me 'the pocketed honor', is justified. "Deng Xiao Mans, "award certificates now has the Internet made, why he do not look for it " Fang responded by saying, "I saw the award certificates presented photos online, said that with Mr. Yang's The name I would like to ask a, Mr. Yang Zutao hands award certificates "the Mr. Yang Zutao out clear a word, things will get to the bottom." Xiao-Mang Deng said, can be "more than three years, we have almost no contact. I do not know Mr. Yang Zutao how to think, he never directly said to me. "confirmed by Mr. Wang Li Xiao-Mang Deng commission issued an open letter, Mr. Yang Zutao so far have never had a clear view. Only heard that Mr. Yang advanced age, hearing acuity bad inconvenience disturb, so we can not provide more information. "Reporter tried to contact Mr. Yang Zutao, but received no response as of press. "There is no new evidence could make me change my mind, nothing to add." Fang said. As for the bonus, "If Xiao-Mang Deng said is true", he is willing References others saying "that he pocketed bonuses" apology. Fang said in another "authority" Fang and Deng Xiaomang two, uncompromising, truth become clearer blurred. The Chinese People's University professor of political science said Zhang Ming evaluation, which to some extent is the Chinese academic the crackdown embarrassing status microcosm. Academic crackdown ecological academia own lack of self-discipline consensus, academic ethics committee official agencies 'omission' Therefore, when the case of academic fraud, this is common to do this by academic and official crackdown career 'private individuals' who inevitably fall. "Xiao-Mang Deng proposed" open letter "academic crackdown is not easy, especially for the powerless nobodies" of the language, it seems that is a reflection of the civil forces "leading role" of the stage, regardless of the crackdown by batters are inevitably encounter difficulties. Xiao-Mang Deng told reporters that his alleged "nobodies" generally refers to administrative title and position and influence to the ordinary scholar, also a. "Relatively powerful 'school official' group apparently belong to 'any punches' was some unknown attacks, the exculpatory and confrontation counterattack on much relatively weak." Xiao-Mang Deng think Fang finds its pit division,

É necessário se cadastrar para acessar o conteúdo.

, with his crackdown ideas related to the gullible Internet rumors, due to negligence. Xiao-Mang Deng seems academic crackdown need "irrefutable evidence" must collect mastered all the documentary material, every step of the operational procedures, to come up with witnesses and evidence, "hitter" in the evidence before the irrefutable . Identified Xiao-Mang Deng Fang microblogging pit division ", and still adhere to the receipt of the" open letter "to the previous judgment, also attracted some netizens questioned. "Things have questions, doubts or s

É necessário se cadastrar para acessar o conteúdo.

estions, itself, is not wrong, but do not jumping to conclusions, even finds unfair, his help pull out the 'knife' should be is the fact that simply said" friends "Tao North" : "match-fixing risks, taking of evidence to be cautious." the king said that the academic crackdown involving the reputation of others,

É necessário se cadastrar para acessar o conteúdo.

, so in counterfeiting questions, complete chain of evidence for a chain that must be mastered. Friends "far nearly Chi Ming" also questioned Fang there have been in response to the open letter, "If Xiao-Mang Deng said is true" language, "but to identify whether this is true not precisely match fixing " For more than ten years, Fang is famed nationwide crackdown hero. The users worried Joker: "Fang the anti-'authority', but if they become another authority " In this regard, Zhang Ming Fang as a "fake fighter" has always speak up, even if sometimes Conclusion enough authority, the influence of the public can not be overlooked. "Fang finds Xiao-Mang Deng the 'Pit division' attitude should be a little more careful." He believes that Fang at least should be found in the original awards material, and then comment on award certificate and verification and is impressed pottery teacher. "This will reduce the probability of 'friendly fire', is a minimum of respect for others." The civil forces play the leading role limitations, however, provoked by the non-governmental forces the academic crackdown girders context, "before the civil requirements powerless people in the crackdown first made a 'ironclad' bit inconsiderate. "Zhang Ming, at the same time said,

É necessário se cadastrar para acessar o conteúdo.

," Fang influential, but he was, after all, belong to private individuals 'school official' powerful environment to go it alone made 'ironclad', resistance can be imagined. speaking, from a legal perspective, there may be illegal. academic institutions, the same as it is now paralyzed does not work, any allegations and controversy are easily turned into bickering factions struggle. "Xiao-Mang Deng also said so. Zhang Ming said that China's academic crackdown mainly by non-governmental forces, which doomed the crackdown means tend to be more "live" due to the lack of accurate information sources, concluded "less accurate", the behavior is more difficult constraints, therefore, inevitably showing "a mess" counterfeiting situation. Fang admits: the academic crackdown "by the strength of the individual, limited energy and resources, not enough authority, not the norm, is quite upset when the system is missing." As for how to do this, the king has called a solid style of match fixing peace and to discuss the state of mind,

É necessário se cadastrar para acessar o conteúdo.

, "This is the most basic quality of the so-called academic crackdown." Fang told reporters, to expose fraud solid, evidence, "but to expose the fraud is not an academic discussion, do not have to 'calm'." the of Professor Deng Xiaomang in this point agree with Fang, he said that the current that is still mainly based on non-governmental forces to crackdown, then they should affirm its positive role. Xiao-Mang Deng also said that online information is the the Private Enforcement important channels. "Private Enforcement it difficult to overcome the limitations,

É necessário se cadastrar para acessar o conteúdo.

, such as the crackdown by academic standards, certification status, neutrality and credibility may be somewhat lacking." Zhang Ming, proposed to make the academic crackdown road go more robust can learn from foreign experience fostered a common right and wrong,

É necessário se cadastrar para acessar o conteúdo.

, and academic moral bottom line, "the academic community in the current academic scholarship, is a feasible way. Foreign Universities within the academic community, for the identification and treatment of the problem of academic fraud already have a mature operating rules. "Scholars plagiarized article was published, scholars often have to bear the huge loss of reputation, and from this is difficult to gain a foothold in the 'Community'." Zhang Ming said, "Even if he Jiaolai, 'Community' School Board and other agencies responsible for arbitration, identified by experts to be responsible. generally without judicial power to intervene,

É necessário se cadastrar para acessar o conteúdo.

, can be more peaceful, fair deal with the matter. "

Entrar

Quem está por aqui 0 membros estão online

but does not preclude the publication will Collaborators included in

Posts Recomendados

k22lb10ov 0

Link para o comentário

Compartilhar em outros sites

Fóruns

Todas Atividades

Lojinha WC

Informação Importante